Is it any wonder why women came out in huge numbers to vote for Hillary?

After the jerks held up their shirts for her to iron. Anyone else think that maybe women are sending a message to the world?Is it any wonder why women came out in huge numbers to vote for Hillary?
WOMEN ROCK!





Since I was 12 they talked about how the youth would ';rock the vote'; but this year the women will come out and show the world the power that they have.





I am a republican and have been one since birth as I was born to Reagan Republicans. This year...I hope Hillary takes it. She is the only qualified candidate.





Cheers!Is it any wonder why women came out in huge numbers to vote for Hillary?
If women voted for Hillary because of the ';Iron My Shirt'; protest they are incredibly stupid and shouldn't be allowed to vote... that was even more phony and calculated than the crying scam.
No, I don't think it is.





A century ago women here finally got permission to vote, and it took them 1 century to get the First viable women candidate! Some progress..





I am just happy it wasn't Condi Rice to get that honor, because women like her have not made this any easier.





People who think there anything even close to gender equality here or in most of the world need to be more in touch with their feelings maybe. Because the treatment of Hillary by a lot of people is Clearly sexist.
i'll never vote for hillary. she does nothing for women, except pander to them.
oh please,women will vote for her solely on the basis that they want to see woman as president,and that is not the right reason to vote for her.she has NO proven record,she flip flops on all major issues,hasnt done a damn thing for the people of new york except use her office to launch her campaign for presidency,and the first ';lady'; will be a former president who came within a breath of being impeached for all the bullshit he pulled while he was in office.its time to bury the clintons and their political games.WE suffer when people like them hold office,WAKE UP!!!Vince Foster most likely killed himself so he wouldnt be a part of bill clintons unveiling as a piece of garbage,they lied to the man for years!Hillary blocked the release of her own records,that tells me she is hiding something!!!its YOU that needs to BE WARNED!
Washington, DC ­ Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and


prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2007 list of Washington’s


“Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order,


includes:





1. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY): In addition to her long and sordid


ethics record, Senator Hillary Clinton took a lot of heat in 2007 ­ and rightly


so ­ for blocking the release of her official White House records. Many suspect


these records contain a treasure trove of information related to her role in a


number of serious Clinton-era scandals. Moreover, in March 2007, Judicial Watch


filed an ethics complaint against Senator Clinton for filing false financial


disclosure forms with the U.S. Senate (again). And Hillary’s top campaign


contributor, Norman Hsu, was exposed as a felon and a fugitive from justice in


2007. Hsu pleaded guilt to one count of grand theft for defrauding investors as


part of a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme





6. Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR): Governor Huckabee enjoyed a meteoric rise in


the polls in December 2007, which prompted a more thorough review of his ethics


record. According to The Associated Press: “[Huckabee’s] career has also been


colored by 14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity,


ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit


organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files


on his way out of the governor’s office.” And what was Governor Huckabee’s


response to these ethics allegations? Rather than cooperating with


investigators, Huckabee sued the state ethics commission twice and attempted to


shut the ethics process down.





8. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL): A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator


Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered


that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted


political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko http://tinyurl.com/3cegmw . In 2007,


more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political


connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate,


Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major


investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a


biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks


after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also


nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal


law








infowars.com


prisonplanet.com


realityzone.com


truthorlove.com


gcnlive.com


rbnlive.com
Well, frankly, people were swayed by Hillary getting teary eyed. Heck of a way to elect a President.





By the way, Hillary would in no way be on the national stage if not for her marrying well.





Hillary is hardly some banner for feminism my friend. She is self serving and cynical, as much as I can remember by any candidate.





If having no shame and using your adulterous husbands name in seeking office is considered by a majority as feminism, God help us all.
If they came out in ';huge numbers'; she would have won with 51%, not 30-something.





The majority of women STILL voted for someone else. What does THAT tell you?





To vote for a candidate just because they have a vagina is as stupid as voting for a candidate because they have a penis.
to vote for a candidate that will do anything for the vote and most likely that will completely corrupt the american government (already corrupted) does send a message out there, women are quite crazy





go obama!
Think about how many votes she would get if she was married to Obama...
I'm not going to vote on a candidate based on gender but you're right. It is time. It would be a nice change to have a female in the highest office in the country. Let's face it, we've got to do something different than we've been doing.
She can't win the general election...If you want her to make history as being the first woman nominee, congratulations. As a Democrat, I would like to win for once. She will pull no independent votes and Republicans will come out in droves to vote against her
Yeah, but it is the wrong message. Their message is ';We don't care if it is the devil-woman. As long as it is a woman.';





Nice Lady...excellent point. I do not know one woman who will vote for her...oops I know one. She is an immoral idiot.





Super Pl...there is NO WAY you are a Reagan conservative and want a socialist to win. You either have no clue who Hillary is or you have NEVER been a Reagan conservative.





katydid...you are almost right. It is time a woman who is FOR this country and NOT a socialist steps up. I would welcome a woman president, but Hillary is against everything this country stands for.





xuserx...you are right. I do not agree. There are horrible candidates on boths sides. Rudy, McCain, Paul, Obama, Clinton, Edwards...ALL HORRIBLE CANDIDATES!





bellatruth...I can only find as new as 2006, but on that list, Hillary is there, Obama is an honorable mention (not top 10) and Huckabee is not there at all.
Anyone who actually believes those were not Hillary plants has serious thinking problems.





Here is a link to our future if she becomes president.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWvHbOoG3…
I think alot of women are afraid of looking back 10 years from now, knowing they didn't cast a vote for the first woman president.





People can say all they want to ';gender has nothing to do with it';...but they are lying to themselves. It's not everything, but it is definitely part of it.





She has experience and she's smart... same with alot of the other candidates. There really isn't a ';horrible'; candidate on either side....though some will disagree with me on that.... So after you decide to swallow a candidates policy stances, what you are left with is ';likeability'; as a deciding factor. Woman relate to other woman, minorities relate to other minorities. It's simply a desire to have someone ';like you'; represent you.
It is a wonder. Hillary used a man to get everywhere she is in life. Is that the kind of example you want to set for strong, independent women? Because if it is, some feminist you turned out to be.





As far as me holding my shirt up for some woman to iron, I say, not bloody likely. No woman is going to be doing my laundry, ironing my shirts, cooking my meals or washing my dishes. I'm perfectly capable of doing all that myself, thank you very much.
Oh yeah it's no wonder. Women will be free to break our balls for four years if she gets in.